ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The association of COVID-19 with diabetes mellitus is bidirectional. In one direction, diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19. In the opposite direction, in patients with COVID-19 new-onset diabetes mellitus, severe diabetic ketoacidosis and severe metabolic complications have been described. CLINICAL CASE: This report describes two patients with diabetes mellitus who came to our hospital with ketoacidosis resulting from new-onset diabetes mellitus. We describe the clinical course and the management approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 is associated with metabolic complications such as severe diabetic ketoacidosis.
INTRODUCCIÓN: La relación entre la enfermedad por el coronavirus de 2019 (COVID-19) secundaria a SARS-CoV-2 y la diabetes mellitus es bidireccional. Por un lado, la diabetes mellitus se asocia con un mayor riesgo de COVID-19 grave. Por otro lado, en pacientes con COVID-19 se han observado diabetes mellitus de nueva aparición con presentaciones de cetoacidosis diabética y complicaciones metabólicas graves de dicha presentación. CASOS CLÍNICOS: En este informe, describimos a dos pacientes pediátricos con diabetes mellitus que acudieron a nuestro hospital con cetoacidosis diabética, de debut inicial. Describimos la evolución y el manejo clínico y terapéutico durante la pandemia de COVID-19. CONCLUSIÓN: La infección por COVID-19 puede precipitar complicaciones como cetoacidosis diabética severa.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , Diabetic Ketoacidosis/etiology , Brain Edema/etiology , Child , Female , Humans , Hypoxia, Brain/etiology , MaleABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic has led to challenges in provision of care, clinical assessment and communication with families. The unique considerations associated with evaluation of catastrophic brain injury and death by neurologic criteria in patients with Covid-19 infection have not been examined. METHODS: We describe the evaluation of six patients hospitalized at a health network in New York City in April 2020 who had Covid-19, were comatose and had absent brainstem reflexes. RESULTS: Four males and two females with a median age of 58.5 (IQR 47-68) were evaluated for catastrophic brain injury due to stroke and/or global anoxic injury at a median of 14 days (IQR 13-18) after admission for acute respiratory failure due to Covid-19. All patients had hypotension requiring vasopressors and had been treated with sedative/narcotic drips for ventilator dyssynchrony. Among these patients, 5 had received paralytics. Apnea testing was performed for 1 patient due to the decision to withdraw treatment (n = 2), concern for inability to tolerate testing (n = 2) and observation of spontaneous respirations (n = 1). The apnea test was aborted due to hypoxia and hypotension. After ancillary testing, death was declared in three patients based on neurologic criteria and in three patients based on cardiopulmonary criteria (after withdrawal of support (n = 2) or cardiopulmonary arrest (n = 1)). A family member was able to visit 5/6 patients prior to cardiopulmonary arrest/discontinuation of organ support. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to evaluate patients with catastrophic brain injury and declare brain death despite the Covid-19 pandemic, but this requires unique considerations.